Should child support really be the way it is?
King X asked:
I wrote this just to start a little thinking…and maybe upset some people who use it for revenage instead of providing a lucrative enviroment for children..
The Gold Digger Law.
We the people request an amendment to child support laws.
1.If the individual makes over 100,000 then, 75% of the payment shall be deposited into a trust fund, and 25% allocated to the child, to sustain appropriate living conditions until the child is 18yrs of age.
2.The trust fund shall be made out to the child and will only be accessible upon the 21st birthday, unless college is obtained at an earlier age; than increments of the trust fund shall be allocated appropriately to the college and place of residents which the college student resides. These increments will only be large enough to pay for: tuition, books, college meal plan, apartment or dorm, for the child while attending college. These increments are only to be released to the child, if they are enrolled in college full time and have the intent to obtain a 4 year degree
3.If the child does not plan on obtaining a four year degree than he/she must wait until they are 25yr of age to receive half of their trust fund. After five years they will receive the other half, at the age of 30; to make sure a full responsibility of adulthood is achieved
4.During the first 30 yrs of the Childs life, no loans or transactions can be made upon the trust fund, or guarantee payment to any entity, or debt charged to the trust fund from the age of 1 to 18, or collections from credit agencies accessed or borrow any monies until dispersed. This statement is to protect the child’s trust fund from being manipulated by guardians or creditors who claim reimbursement for excess living expenses, out side of the 25% or 3% allocated to the child for sustainable living conditions.
5.During the time of child support the guardian shall make every attempt to work and not rely on child support to provide for their total living expenses. If the payee accuses the guardian of abusing allocated monies then, he/she can ask the court to deposit more money into the child trust fund to reduce the amount of money not being properly used.
6.If the guardian marries anyone other than the father/mother of the child, than all money received from child support shall be automatically deposited into the trust fund; only, private school tuition, uniforms, and the 25% 0f allocated funds for sustainment shall now be reduced to 3%, till the child’s 18th birthday.
7.If the child is suffering from mental retardation or a reoccurring illness that falls within the boundaries of a life time disease, than monies from the trust fund shall be allocated to accommodate such illness. The accommodation of monies shall be referred to by the state’, Friend of the Court, in order to make a solid judgment on how much of the trust fund should be released for the purpose of ease of life, and living conditions which need additional monetary attention.
Related posts:
- Should a certain % of child support go into a trust fund? alberthastings3 asked: We all know about dead beat dads, but...
- Child Support problems and issues; did the court (lawyer or case worker) explain these things to you? Yvette B yvetteb asked: Child support Calculator, problems and issues;...
- Child support Calculator; did the court (lawyer or case worker) explain these things to you? Yvette B yvetteb asked: They are supposed to explain these...
- how can i get out of pay child support if i give up my parental rights can the courts throw me in the slammer wanda l asked: theier two children in question one i...
- Child support and DEATBEAT help; post their pics on this site of deadbeats? Yvette B yvetteb asked: Post the DEADBEAT PARENT who owes...
Filed Under Marriage & Divorce |
Tagged With Child Support Laws, Guardians, Living Expenses
Comments
2 Responses to “Should child support really be the way it is?”
King, I loke some of yoru suggestions. And there is some benefit to having a specific rule. But you’ll probably agree there are many instances wehre flexibility offers better options in some cases. The truth is, virtually every case is “exceptional”. The problem is the lack of uniformity in application, even of fixed rules, much less flexible approaches. Too bad we can’t have a hard rule that all family law judges must exercise “good judgment” when it comes to matters of chiuld and spousal support. But your ideas have a lot of merit. Thanks for your efforts here.
Child support laws vary state to state. I guess in some states children are harder to raise. There should be a national law, and it should be based on a percentage of income BELOW $80,000.
If my spouse made $100K a year, I would have to question why I was awarded custody, and they were not.
YES, these laws are a strain on the legal system. There should be an incentive law for those interested in law, sciences, and math. This is a dying breed.
All too often, people shack up, then there is a baby to contend with. THEN Child support.
Well, I am sorry, If you dont know who the Baby’s Daddy is, then you need more help than money.
If you are having children just to get the taxes, then you are completle ignorant, because that is no way to raise a child.